Nice rim when it was more widely used. The later rims I worked with weren’t as round and consistent. Lots of complaints about rattling slag by the joint. People have resorted to inserting foam into a small hole by the joint to stop the rattle since the pieces have no way of being removed. Eyelets have been known to loosen up and make noise as well. I’m not really sure why Mavic even makes these rims anymore.
Look, it’s just that when every hipster is screaming ‘architype’ this ‘architype’ that, ‘they’re amazing’ I naturally become suspicious. If the hard ano version lasts just like an OP CD I would be happy.
Irrespective of the performance of Archetypes and other ‘premium’ rims, I still think Jason’s review of the OP is overly harsh. There is nothing wrong with them, they work. I’ve had a set for 2 years with no issues. No they don’t have the wide rim with ‘magical’ ride quality, but they function fine.
Jason remarks that ‘I wonder why Mavic still sells these?’ as though these are an obsolete item. But why would Mavic change something that has been the benchmark rim for like 20 years? If Mavic cared about selling individual rims I’m sure they would invest some time and effort in making a modern, wide OP Mark. 2. But they don’t because they know they’ll make more money from wheelsets.
Because rim technology has moved on and you can get something essentially the same for less, with better machining, less weight and better quality control. From DT Swiss for example.
No-one is saying that they’ve ceased to function as rims, just that there are better ones out there. Your brand loyalty isn’t allowing you to see the efficacy of the alternatives, or indeed the failings of the Open Pro.