I’m not really sure what the point of the article is. There is of course a cheap swipe at cyclists following the Sydney cyclist road rage incident.
The picture that accompanies the article doesn’t ‘help’ either…
It’s really quite a ridiculous illustration if you think about it! :roll:
I’m reminded of the ring of large wheelnuts on bus and coach wheels.
If only he’d raped that bus driver - then he might have had her support. One can imagine her saying ‘riding in traffic is confrontational, aggressive, boys have to let off steam every now and then.’
I read that whole article and now wish that i didn’t. Its so pointless, who really cares if a bus driver was a victim of ‘cyclist rage’, does that really warrant a weeks news attention and a massive newspaper article? If the rider is dumb enough to ride on a motorway in a bus lane then you really have to expect the odd close call anyway. Plus who really cares about the affairs of a bus driver? Get over it Sydney…
She’s just a sh!t-stirrer who’s too lazy to come up with a new argument and has regurgitated what has been said way too many times in the past. Good to see the majority of the comments left seem to be from the pro-cycling side telling her what a goose she is, which makes a nice change from the usual drivel
She’s just a Right Wing Troll, who lives under a bridge with her good friend Janet Albrechsten. Waiting to pounce on unsuspecting little children to wander by to gobble them all up.
yeah, just giving motorists further ‘reasons’ to hate. can’t believe this shit gets published… though it is the age.
the fact that she writes “The former roads minister Carl Scully, a vegetarian cyclist” (like being vegetarian is relevant) gives an indication of the calibre of the whole article.
When i saw it i assumed the whole thing was a joke and i was laughing along. It was a few paragraphs before i realized and then i just stopped. I was so confused by the fact someone was actually expecting the shit to be taken seriously.